HOUSTON, April 30, 2010 – Following a complex three-month jury trial against the Port of Houston Authority—and a resulting jury verdict for Gibbs & Bruns client Zachry Construction Corporation—the trial court entered final judgment this week awarding Zachry $23.4 million in damages. This breach of contract lawsuit arose from the Port’s last-minute rejection of a contractually approved construction method Zachry intended to use to build a 2000-foot wharf facility.
Zachry began construction on a 1660-foot wharf at the Port’s Bayport terminal in June 2004, targeting a partial completion date of February 2006 in preparation for a specialized crane delivery from China. Once construction was well underway, Port officials realized they underestimated the size of the wharf required and determined it needed to be 332 feet longer than originally planned.
Zachry originally intended to build the wharf under dry conditions by constructing a frozen soil wall around the facility. The wall would act as a temporary coffer dam allowing Zachry to construct the wharf using conventional methods. Because it became necessary to expand the wharf mid-construction, Zachry proposed to divide the project in half using a frozen soil cutoff wall. The frozen cutoff wall would permit Zachry to achieve a partial completion of the wharf which would accommodate the crane delivery from China and allow construction to continue on the rest of the wharf (including the 332-foot extension) under dry conditions.
After accepting Zachry’s proposal to build the additional section, the Port subsequently rejected Zachry’s planned construction methodology. As a result, Zachry was precluded from using a frozen soil wall to excavate the site under dry conditions and was forced to use a more traditional excavation technique to be ready for the delivery from China. The change in methodology caused Zachry substantial cost and time overruns. At trial, the Port denied it breached the contract and alleged that Zachry’s own inefficiencies caused Zachry to change its construction methodology.
The three-month trial was heard before Harris County Civil District Judge Mike Engelhart. Following three days of deliberation, the jury returned with a resounding verdict for Zachry, awarding the company over $18 million in damages. The court’s final judgment of $23.4 million includes sums that the Court found the Port improperly withheld as a matter of law, as well as prejudgment interest.
Prior to trial, Gibbs & Bruns successfully defeated several summary judgment motions filed by the Port seeking to dismiss the case in its entirety.
The Gibbs & Bruns trial team included Robin Gibbs, Sydney Ballesteros, Jennifer Horan Greer, and Mike Absmeier. Zachry was also represented by Brandon Allen of Reynolds, Frizzell, Black, Doyle, Allen & Oldham LLP.
About Gibbs & Bruns LLP
Gibbs & Bruns is a leading boutique law firm engaging in high-stakes business and commercial litigation. The firm is renowned for its representation of both plaintiffs and defendants in complex matters, including securities, energy, director and officer liability, fraud and fiduciary claims, institutional investor, legal malpractice, intellectual property, contract, construction, antitrust, and partnership disputes. Gibbs & Bruns is routinely recognized as a top commercial litigation firm in the US. For more information, please visit www.gibbsbruns.com.